About

Our Positions

Where Working Educators stands on the issues affecting teachers and students in the age of AI.

Working Educators has always taken positions on issues that affect our profession and our students. We believe clarity matters — teachers deserve to know where we stand.

Legacy Context

This page continues our tradition of public position statements. Like our earlier statements on police violence, immigrant rights, and education funding, these positions reflect our values as working educators.

On AI in Education

Teachers should lead the AI conversation

Decisions about AI in classrooms should be informed by teachers — not just administrators, tech companies, or policymakers. We have the daily experience of navigating these challenges. Our voices should matter.

AI is neither uniformly good nor bad

We reject both uncritical techno-optimism and reflexive techno-phobia. AI tools can help teachers teach and harm students' learning, depending on how they're used. Nuance matters.

Students need AI literacy

Banning AI from education doesn't prepare students for a world where AI is ubiquitous. Schools should teach students how AI works, its limitations, and how to use it ethically and effectively.

On Academic Integrity

Integrity is about learning, not compliance

The goal of academic integrity isn't catching cheaters — it's fostering authentic learning. When we focus only on detection, we miss the point.

Detection tools are imperfect

AI detection software has significant false positive rates. No student should be punished based solely on algorithmic judgment. Human review and due process are essential.

Clear policies prevent harm

Students and teachers need clear, consistent policies about what AI use is permitted. Ambiguity creates anxiety and injustice.

On Equitable AI Detection

Bias in AI tools is a justice issue

AI detection tools have documented biases against non-native English speakers and certain writing styles. This isn't a technical glitch — it's an equity issue that disproportionately harms marginalized students.

Students deserve due process

Accusations of AI cheating can derail academic careers. Students must have clear appeals processes and the presumption of innocence.

Transparency is non-negotiable

Students should know what detection tools are being used, how they work, and what happens if they're flagged. Hidden surveillance erodes trust.

On Teacher Professional Development

AI training should be mandatory and funded

Teachers cannot navigate AI without support. States and districts should provide funded, ongoing professional development on AI literacy.

Teachers should design AI training

The best AI training comes from educators who understand classroom realities — not vendors selling products or administrators who haven't taught in years.

On Education Policy

Policy should follow evidence, not panic

AI in education requires thoughtful policy, not reactive bans or mandates. We support evidence-based approaches that consider unintended consequences.

Teacher voice in policy is essential

No AI education policy should be adopted without meaningful input from classroom teachers. We're the ones who implement policy — we should help shape it.

Questions? Disagreements?

These positions reflect our current thinking. We're always learning and willing to reconsider. If you disagree or have evidence we should consider, reach out.

Contact Us